By Elizabeth Prata

This essay is not about whether you should wear had coverings. It is about discerning those who tell you you should wear head coverings.
The advent of the internet and all its social media platforms and availability of widely distributed material is a blessing, especially for those in closed countries, disabled, or are without other means of reaching Christian content. However it is also a curse, because of course satan uses it to promote his agenda, which is to disseminate false material and raise up false teachers to confuse the sheep.
There are many preachers, evangelists, and teachers out there who occupy and use the biblical title. Some are good, others are false. But beyond those, there are an abundance of what we call Christian Influencers or Christian Content Creators who do not occupy a specific title (and some aren’t even attached to a specific church) but they still influence the sheep within the faith by publishing Christian content.
All are claiming your attention and many claim to be the real deal within Christianity. Not all are the real deal.
Recently I was asked about Madaline Mikayla.
She is a 29 year old online personality, AKA content creator, who publishes at the time of this writing on Youtube, TikTok, Facebook, and Instagram. She focuses on head coverings, for which she uses the term “veiling”. She also covers the topics of modesty and marital abuse of women.
Head Coverings
In her video linked here on Instagram, Madaline Mikayla says that a woman must cover her head. Ms. Mikayla states that it is not a personal conviction. It is not a passed-away cultural norm. It is a command from God.
She explains in her testimony video that in college, her “spiritual leaders” held a night of “prayer and deliverance”. When she got back to her dorm room she “strongly felt God’s presence”, and “out of nowhere I heard God tell me, ‘Cover your head’. (Source)
Unlike Bible believers who hear and obey when God commands them, Ms Mikayla disobeyed. For years. Jonah excepted. Her reason for disobeying was that “If this is something God wanted me to do, why aren’t more Christian celebrities doing it?”
We look to the Bible for confirmation of Gods commands. Second, we do not look around at celebrities to confirm that this is what God wants us to do.
Some years later, she said God spoke to her again. This time she knew it was God because of the first encounter she’d had when “he” had told her to cover her head. But she still refused for 5 more months. “That was how badly I didn’t want to cover my hair.” Mikayla eventually succumbed to the ‘command’ she’d heard.
However, Dr. Owen Strachan, Senior Director of the Dobson Culture Center at the James Dobson Family Institute, and a teaching fellow and director of ministry at Redeemer Bible Church, says that the First Corinthian passage regarding head coverings is one of the most difficult passages to exegete, and causes the most debate in seminaries.
But Madaline Mikayla has it figured out to the point of hardened certainty? Red flag #1: when someone claims to have THE answer on a passage that has caused debate and difficulty for 2000 years for everyone else, be suspicious.
Mikayla further details the amount and the type of covering, even though the Bible does not describe it. Mikayla says handkerchiefs, hats, bandannas and the like are not appropriate because the entire head must be covered, she says.
And even beyond that, all hair must be covered, Mikayla says. Not a bit of it can show. Although a bit of it in front is OK. Again, the Bible does not describe any such thing.
Red flag #2: When a Bible personality claims to have concrete stances about a Christian’s allegedly biblically commanded behavior in details that are not in the Bible, she is a Legalist.
GotQuestions excerpt on the definition of Legalism:
It is a term Christians use to describe a doctrinal position emphasizing a system of rules and regulations for achieving both salvation and spiritual growth. Legalists believe in and demand a strict literal adherence to rules and regulations. Doctrinally, it is a position essentially opposed to grace. … Many legalistic believers today make the error of demanding unqualified adherence to their own biblical interpretations …
Mikayla is making it a rule for women to wear coverings on their heads, prescribing the type and amount, and dictating the length of hair that allegedly satisfies God’s command. Ms Mikayla says her platforms (Youtube, Facebook, etc) are ‘Modesty School, and I am your teacher’. So she is positioning herself as a teacher of the word of God, but has no training. [I did contact Ms Mikayla to ask if she is a member of a local church and she graciously replied that she is a member at a Baptist church.]
Normally an untrained teacher can be acceptable since the Holy Spirit illuminates the scriptures to those whom He will, but some training is always desirable. Importantly, if one is a teacher, be warned. “Do not become teachers in large numbers, my brothers, since you know that we who are teachers will incur a stricter judgment.” (James 3:1).
Red flag #3: Ms. Mikayla misinterprets one of the verses upon which she hinges her stance that total head and hair coverings are a commend for today for all women-
For if a woman does not cover her head, have her also cut her hair off; however, if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, have her cover her head. (1 Corinthians 11:6).
Ms Mikayla says that “1 Corinthians 11 says if a woman refuses to veil, she should cut off all her hair. This is because the length of our hair is supposed to be covered.” (Source)
No…the Bible does not specifically say all strands of a woman’s long hair must be covered. Paul was using sarcasm. At the time, temple prostitutes signaled their profession by going about uncovered with short hair. Paul is saying, if you won’t cover your head, you might as well signal you are a prostitute, so go all the way and why don’t you cut off your hair?
Ellicott’s commentary explains the verse- Let her also be shorn.—The force of this argument depends on the fact that a woman’s head being uncovered would be regarded by others as implying the same shame as was indicated by a woman’s hair being cut short (i.e., shorn), or altogether removed (i.e., shaven). It is as if the Apostle said—If a woman insists on her right to pray and speak in an assembly with uncovered head, let her carry out this principle to its logical result; let her insist on her right to have her hair cut short, so as to show her equality with man—and what would be thought of her then! No woman with a spark of shame in her would think of doing that. ~Ellicott’s commentary on 1 Corinthians 11:6
Wiersbe on 1 Cor 11:6, The Corinthian women who appeared in the assembly without the head-covering were actually putting themselves on the low level of the temple prostitutes. The prostitutes wore their hair very short, and they did not wear a head-covering in public. Their hairstyle and manner announced to others just what they were and what they were offering. “If you are going to abandon the covering,” wrote Paul, “then why not go all the way and cut your hair?” Wiersbe, W. W. (1996). The Bible exposition commentary (Vol. 1, p. 604). Victor Books.
Here is a resource for you regarding head coverings for women-
What about female head coverings in 1 Corinthians 11? 9Marks (Tom Schreiner)
“[T]he point of the passage isn’t the cultural practice but the principle of male headship in marriage and the church. In most cultures today, a wife’s submission to male leadership isn’t signified by whether she wears a head-covering or how she wears her hair. Yet it doesn’t follow from this that the text doesn’t speak to us or isn’t authoritative today, for we learn from these verses that there must be distinctions between the sexes and that the leadership of the church comes from men.
“We could compare Paul’s instructions about head-coverings to what he says about the holy kiss. Believers are to greet each other with a “holy kiss” (Rom. 16:16; 1 Cor. 16:20; 2 Cor. 13:12; 1 Thess. 5:26). Today, we’re not required to kiss one another when we greet one another. We obey this command when we greet one another warmly whether with a hug or a handshake. In the same way, the Lord doesn’t require us to replicate the culture of the first century by having women wearing head coverings when the church meets together. What is necessary is that women are submissive to male leadership in the church (of the elders).” –end Tom Schreiner
Red flag #4: Charismaticism. Ms Mikalya relies upon mystical encounters as part of her faith. I’ve listened to several of her videos, including her foundational testimony videos, and in most of them she relates some sort of presence, God personally telling her something, dreams and their interpretation, signs, and visions. Here are a few examples-
“They were having a worship night. Out of nowhere, I felt God’s presence for the first time in my life. It was like a supernatural experience. But I felt like the presence of a spirit. And I feel like most people experience like a dark spirit, but this was like God’s spirit, which is so different. And it was so cleansing feeling and like I felt peace for the first time. And so one of my friends in the [rehab] program who I really looked up to, she’d been a Christian. She was a Christian and she’d been in the program for a while. I told her I wanted to give my life to God. And so I think she and like a staff member walked me through a salvation prayer and I have been a Christian ever since then.”
But in that moment, I had this vision of me like on this road with other people and I was like helping people get off drugs. It was like the craziest thing because I that is not something that would ever cross my mind. But I like had this vision of me helping people.
Abuse
Red flag #5: Abuse. If you watch Ms Mikayla’s testimony video she is transparent about her past sins. Good for her. She went through the wringer. She’d endured arrests, violence, sexual abuse, being a runaway, homelessness, drugs, rehab programs, juvie… Her sins ran the gamut. In this season of her life as a Christian teacher of modesty, she also focuses her teaching on abuse in marriage. By her description, she was in an abusive marriage.
Ms Mikayla teaches that “One of the most common misconceptions that Christian women believe today is that they are Biblically required to stay in a marriage where they are being emotionally, verbally, psychologically, physically, sexually, and/or financially abused by their husband. However, Biblically, this is not true.”
I find nowhere in the Bible that ‘verbal abuse’, ‘financial abuse’ or ’emotional abuse’ qualifies as a legitimate reason for divorce. The Bible lists adultery and abandonment as the only allowable reasons, and bear in mind, those are not commands to divorce. Reconciliation is still the best outcome. Sadly, the 1 Corinthians 7:15 reason of abandonment has been broadened to cover a multitude of illegitimate reasons to leave a husband.
Some counselors and clergy, wishing to be gracious, have defined abandonment in overly broad terms. Some say that it can refer to hardships experienced because of addiction, mental illness, prison sentences, or unkindness. That is not the biblical definition of abandonment, however—unless such hardships rise to the level of abuse, but that is a different topic.
Conclusion
The issue about head coverings as presented to us in 1 Corinthians 11 is a thorny and complicated one. As Dr. Strachan mentioned, it causes an exegetical problem and sparks much debate. Wherever you come down on the issue of head coverings for women, is up to you. If you believe it is a mandate, then do as your interpretation of the pertinent verses guide you, knowing that it is important not to go beyond scripture. If you believe it is a personal conscience issue, then go with God and your conscience.
The point of this essay is to warn about people who claim to have certainty in this cloudy issue. I warn about those who add extrabiblical revelation and charismaticism to their teaching, who claim to be a teacher but whose teaching indicates a naive understanding of a complex issue, as well as an interpretive error leading to Legalism.
Ms Mikayla may be well intentioned and earnest in her conviction to wear a covering on her head and her hair, and more power to her. But her conclusions AND the road on which she arrived at those conclusions is riddled with potholes of error. I’ll include some credible resources for women who seek information on head coverings.
This next is an aside, my opinion. There seem to be trends among the niche factions. Many in the Hebrew Roots movement insist on using the name ‘Yeshua’ in and writings. In the Head Covering/Modesty movement, many like Ms Mikayla, insist on calling it ‘veiling’. I find these kind of terms precious and fake. Yes, the word in Greek for covering is defined as covering OR veiling, but the centuries long commonly understood word has always been covering.
Additionally, Muslims veil. Their standards of covering the hair and head are as strict as Ms Mikayla insists upon. We do not want to align with or seem to be syncretic with such an evil false religion as Islam. In fact, many Muslim women follow Ms Mikayla and applaud her teachings. We share nothing in common with Muslims.
Further Resources
Discovering Head Coverings: podcast from A Word Fitly Spoken by Amy Spreeman and Michelle Lesley
Further Resources
Head Coverings for Women– Bible Q&A, John MacArthur
Discovering Head Coverings: podcast from A Word Fitly Spoken by Amy Spreeman and Michelle Lesley
A prelude to head coverings: podcast WWUTT by pastor Gabe Hughes
Q&A Head Coverings, Culture or Corporate, podcast WWUTT pastor Gabe Hughes






























