By Elizabeth Prata
In 2010 I reported on a stunning move by the Scottish Episcopal Church to change all male-oriented language to gender neutral language. Well 13 years ago it was stunning. A new order of service produced by the Scottish Episcopal Church has caused controversy by removing masculine references to God.
“Female priests asked why God was still referred to as a man. The new form of worship, which removes words such as “Lord, he, his, him” and “mankind” from services, has been written by the church in an attempt to acknowledge that God is “beyond human gender”. Episcopalian bishops have approved the introduction of more “inclusive” language, which deliberately removes references suggesting that God is of male gender.”
They were already on a bad path. Did you catch that? “Female priests.” It sounds humble to say God is beyond gender. And while it is true, it is not humble. God revealed Himself as male in His word in His own words.
Once man decides to alter God’s word, it never stops there. It’s like all the leashes, and guardrails, and boundaries suddenly disappear and all bets are off. The Bible becomes a free-for-all.
Since sin never lays still and never ceases to try and pollute God’s people and His church, I decided to check back in now that 13 years have passed. Let’s see how the Scottish Episcopal Church is doing now. There is an advantage to have been blogging for 15 years, the chronicling I’ve done allows me to see trajectories. So, I checked back in with the Scottish Episcopal church now that it’s 2023 and 13 years have passed.
What happens when the rock starts sliding down the hill? It picks up speed. By 2017 the Scottish Episcopal Church voted to allow homosexual marriage. To become homosexual “inclusive”. Just 7 years after the change of language of God as male. It was stated,
By removing gender from our marriage canon, our church now affirms that a same sex couple are not just married but are married in the sight of God.
By the way, they call homosexual marriage “equal marriage”.
Gay times indeed.
First, we already know that God is spirit and thus beyond human gender. Reiterating that fact by changing the language is not necessary. That language is already in the Bible. As John 4:24 states, “God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in spirit and in truth.” God is a spiritual being. We all know that if we read the Bible.
However, when the ‘female priests asked why God is referred to as a man’, their first answer should have been to refer to the scriptures. The answer is that though God is Spirit, He chose to reveal Himself to humankind as male, and His son was revealed to us as a male also. It is too bad that the method God chose to speak of Himself and the way He chose to reveal Himself to us is not sufficient for the priests at this church. But they were female priests, so…already in sin and therefore unable to think properly of the things above.
Secondly, Jesus, His son, referred to Him as male.
John 8:19 – “So they were saying to Him, “Where is Your Father?” Jesus answered, “You know neither Me nor My Father; if you knew Me, you would know My Father also.””
John 20:17 – “Jesus said to her, “Stop clinging to Me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I ascend to My Father and your Father, and My God and your God.'”” The Apostles also referred to God as a male. (Jude 1:1; 1 Peter 1:3; 2 Thess 1:2…) I’m sorry that the way that our Savior spoke of our Father is not credible to the priests.
They use the word ‘inclusive.” The word ‘inclusive’ these days is usually a code for ‘man’s fleshly desire.’ God is inclusive because anyone who calls on the name of God and repents will be saved.
Changing the scriptures to align with individual desires or mass culture is not only dangerous, but blasphemy. Why? “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,” (2 Tim 3:16). The scriptures the Scottish Church is changing were delivered by God. Man’s corruption of God’s work is blasphemy because it directly disrespects God and His sacred Word. Again, to use an overused word, “all scripture” means ALL, inclusive of Genesis 1:1 to Revelation 22:21.
But! We were told that the days would come when people would not stand for the scriptures as is, but succumb to the pleasant words of man, wanting their ears tickled instead. “For the time will come when men will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear.”
UK Telegraph article concludes, “the blessing at the end of services has been changed by some ministers from “Father, Son and Holy Spirit” to “Creator, Redeemer and Sanctifier”. “The changing of God language is a little tricky,” admitted Rev Darren McFarland, convener of the church’s liturgy committee…” Well that explains it. A committee!
the-end-time.org 
“Professing to be wise, they became fools.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Excellent; thank you Elizabeth! Thoughts about clergy who take (carry) YAHWEH’S name in vain, into the vanity of the unregenerate: “These things you have done and I kept silent; you thought that I was just like you; I will rebuke you and present the case before your eyes.” Psalm 50:21.
I am always upset when without qualm or apprehension (no fear or trembling), “professing” clergy proclaim to and instruct their denomination, therefore all of Christendom and the unregenerate world, their complete ignorance–the marked ambivalence that moves easily into apostasy and ultimately into heretical affectations–concerning the immutable Holiness of the PERSON AND NATURE of our Father God I AM WHO I AM–He who is incarnate I AM in God the Son Christ Jesus, and He Jesus our Kinsman-Redeemer Saviour being fully MAN and FULLY GOD–“He who is the external, pre-existent WORD–ever with God, ever God Himself” (1), to recreate by their “purposed words” I AM, and subsequently Christ Jesus, into a gender-bending non-binary nothingness god, does not preclude including their deep antipathy–repugnance, even “veiled” hatred for the Creator-God I AM’s irrevocable distinguishing (DNA) of the difference between male and female, nor does it exclude making Christ Jesus to be nothing more than an effeminate whose PERSON AND NATURE will substantiate and advance their all-inclusive WOKE gospel of demonic bewitchment. In darkness of spirit are they whose hope (contrived doctrinal expectation) is to supplant and replace I AM’s, therefore Christ Jesus, Holy PERSON AND NATURE (2) with the attributes of their twice-dead over PERSONS AND NATURES.
(1) Reference Source: Mike Riccardi PDF, VEILED IN FLESH THE GODHEAD SEE: A STUDY OF THE KENOSIS OF CHRIST, Introduction, page 103. Refer to Justin Peters indepth podcast with Mike Riccardi, Robert Morris Teaches Full-On Heresy About Jesus – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bD131IhMZR0. See the link in the “more” section to download Mike’s PDF; therein find a reference to **PERSON AND NATURE, page 106 footnote 6. (Note that the caps and bold are mine):
(2) “When we speak of the relationship between Christ’s “NATURES” and His “PERSON,” we need to understand what these fourth-and fifth-century Greek-speakers meant by these terms. Traditionally, Boethius’ definition of a person is regarded as standard: “A person is an individual substance of a rational nature” (as cited in Stephen Wellum, God the Son Incarnate, Foundations of Evangelical Theology [Wheaton: Crossway, 2017], 262n17). On that definition, the properties of PERSONHOOD are individuality, substantiality, and rationality. A NATURE, on the other hand, consists of the attributes, characteristics, and capacities that make a thing what it is, a set of properties by which a person acts. The PERSON IS THE AGENT while THE NATURE IS THE “EQUIPMENT” in and through which the person acts. SUCCINCTLY, THE PERSON IS THE WHO, AND THE NATURE IS THE WHAT. See the discussion in Wellum, GOD THE SON INCARNATE, 262–65, 290–93, 425–29).
LikeLike