Link-a-palooza: Melton, Shack, amillennialism, discernment, reading challenge

Here are some links that will hopefully edify you, or at least get you thinking. I read a comment from Michelle Dacus Lesley the other day and it stuck with me. She wrote on her Twitter stream

It’s getting hard to tell people to examine false teachers against Scripture for themselves. They’re biblically illiterate & don’t know how.

This is a wise and perceptive statement. Women have been led in Bible study groups for a generation now in study of false teachers like Beth Moore and Joyce Meyer. They’ve been told that social justice is where it’s at and to just go out and ‘do something’. They’ve observed that they way to ‘study’ the Bible is to have an emotional discussion about what the verse means ‘to me’ and worse, ‘how I feel about it’. They have experiences they’re told substitute for theology. They have been given coloring books, stickers, and craft activities and told these activities help in sanctification. Many women don’t know HOW to discern any more.

Rule #1: Read the Bible. Just reading it on a regular basis will be the 80% start to a proper perspective, which is a biblical worldview. To start, you do not need a fancy theology class, a glossy set of text books with fill-in-the blank workbook, or any other materials or skills. Just start reading God’s word.

Rule #2 for gaining discernment is prayer. Asking the Holy Spirit to deliver illumination and wisdom is important for our discerning growth. He will do it. He said so in the verse He inspired.

If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. (James 1:5)

And none of us possesses all the wisdom we need, do we? God is the source and fount of all wisdom. He will deliver understanding to his children. But this is where the partnering with God comes in. As RC Sproul taught in the Justification by Faithonline class at Ligonier,

Regeneration is the sovereign, monergistic work of God the Holy Spirit. Monergism means “one working.” God is the only one who is active in regeneration.
The rest of the process of salvation is a synergistic, cooperative work. We are not passive in our sanctification. Our sanctification is to be a diligent labor that we undertake knowing that we have the grace of God working in us.

Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling, (Philippians 2:12)

I won’t go into a lengthy discernment lesson here today. Sometime soon, perhaps a discernment series. Meanwhile, here is an excellent essay on how to detect false teachers by William Swan Plumer (1802-1880) who was an American Presbyterian minister. His commentaries on Psalms and Romans are still widely appreciated.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Today, you will see by the list of links I’ll post below that discernment is much needed by all in these days, and especially for women, because we are so vulnerable to false doctrine. (1 Timothy 2:13–14, 2 Corinthians 11:3). There are many realms necessary for a heightened attention to discernment, from books, movies, false teachers, false doctrine, and celebrity pastors.
I wrote against Glennon Doyle Melton in 2014. Melton is a hugely popular writer and blogger, who purports to be a Christian. Even back in 2014, I saw very troubling holes in her doctrine. Even before 2014, others could see Melton’s stance was troublesome. When I’d written two years ago I’d flatly and clearly said that she is not a Christian. I wrote an update against Melton last month. Since 2014, Melton has become softer in her doctrine,  divorced, become a lesbian, and now she calls God a ‘she.’ With these evidences, no one by any stretch of any imagination can one still say Melton is a Christian. In this post by Amy Spreeman at Berean Examiner, we read more on the latest.

Glennon Doyle Melton calls God a ‘she’.

She’s not the first to call our heavenly Father, Son and Holy Spirit a female.  But Melton may well be one of the few “Christians” to do so. (The Washington Post and People Magazine have both referred to her as a Christian writer, though you won’t see her proclaiming the Gospel or talking about Jesus Christ much.) And thanks to the upcoming The Shack movie, calling the God-head a woman will soon be pretty ho-hum and why not.

Speaking of The Shack, the blockbuster book from 2007 is now being released as a movie.

The Shack is an upcoming American drama film directed by Stuart Hazeldine and co-written by John Fusco, based on the 2007 novel of same name by William P. Young so begins the obligatory Wikipedia entry.

I’d written against The Shack in 2008 and twice in 2009.

The Shack is a devilish deception
The Shack is a doctrine of demons
Why Christians Should Not Read The Shack

This week, Dr. Albert Mohler, President of Southern Seminary and Boyce College, wrote an important piece titled,

The Shack — The Missing Art of Evangelical Discernment

In the shack, “Mack” meets the divine Trinity as “Papa,” an African-American woman; Jesus, a Jewish carpenter; and “Sarayu,” an Asian woman who is revealed to be the Holy Spirit. The book is mainly a series of dialogues between Mack, Papa, Jesus, and Sarayu. Those conversations reveal God to be very different than the God of the Bible. “Papa” is absolutely non-judgmental, and seems most determined to affirm that all humanity is already redeemed.

Photo from The Shack Movie site.
Depicted from left are “Jesus”, the main character Mack (in jacket)
“God”, and “Holy Spirit”. This is offensive in the extreme.
I’ve received the comment quite often that The Shack “is only fiction” and by tacit extension, therefore harmless. Not so. However Dr. Mohler said,

it is also a sustained theological argument, and this simply cannot be denied. Any number of notable novels and works of literature have contained aberrant theology, and even heresy. The crucial question is whether the aberrant doctrines are features of the story or the message of the work. When it comes to The Shack, the really troubling fact is that so many readers are drawn to the theological message of the book, and fail to see how it conflicts with the Bible at so many crucial points.

I recommend his essay highly.

Speaking of ‘Christian’ books, Steven at the Author of My Faith who is a “a Doctrines of Grace, Credobaptist, Complementarian, Cessationist, Amillennial, Christian who loves Jesus Christ’ writer, comments on the lack of integrity in the ‘Christian’ book industry

After witnessing first-hand the lack of integrity that is involved in Christian publishing, the video below helps to make sense of it all. It’s all about the money. It doesn’t matter if the story is true or even orthodox, the bottom line is; can it sell?

The video IS helpful, it explains the connections between the process of raising up a celebrity pastor and his books, and why those books are important to the publishing industry.

The blogger Steve I linked to above said on his About page that he is an amillennialist. A friend of mine recently asked why so many Reformed believing pastors and leaders seem to dismiss the biblical truth that Jesus is planning to gather the saints before the tribulation begins, return when it’s concluded and reign from his earthly kingdom for 1000 years (Millennial Kingdom). Disbelieving the earthly reign of Jesus, or treating the verses referring to is as symbolical only, is amillennialism. I really didn’t have an answer, but I agreed with her that it seems that though many Reformed pastors preach expositorily and well on many verses and doctrines, when it came to eschatology, especially the post-Tribulation events such as the 1000 year reign, they whiff it.

Here is a book recommended by Grace Community Church’s Mike Riccardi. It’s called Amillennialism and the Age to Come by Matt Waymeyer. This book is a solid and charitable defense of premillennialsim (the stance that Jesus is going to gather His saints before the Millennial Kingdom is physically established on earth when the Tribulation is concluded). Here is an excerpt from the preface of Waymeyer’s book.

One of the most encouraging developments in evangelicalism over the past several decades has been the remarkable resurgence of reformed theology. This rediscovery of the doctrines of grace has not only captured the Bible’s emphasis on the sovereignty of God in salvation but also strengthened the unity of the church around the centrality of the gospel.

In the area of eschatology, however, I have noticed two concerning trends among those who have joined this reformation. The first involves what I call eschatological agnosticism. To be sure, eschatology is one of the most difficult theological issues to understand, especially when it comes to the finer details. But some Christians, although diligent students of Scripture in every other area, avoid the topic altogether and appear content to place themselves in the category of undecided. Some even seem proud of their agnosticism, as if ignorance about the meaning of biblical prophecy is evidence of a commitment to more significant matters. But affirming the centrality of the gospel should not mean dismissing the importance of how God will accomplish the restoration of all things to Himself. Scripture reveals too much about the subject of eschatology for Christians to be content in the dark, especially those who preach the Word and shepherd the flock.

A second trend is the way that some Christians are quick to embrace amillennialism simply because they see it as the reformed position on the end times. This appears to be most common among former Arminians. After an initial exposure to reformed theology, they spend the next several years diligently studying the Bible’s teaching on predestination before finally identifying themselves as Calvinists. But their subsequent conversion to amillennialism takes place overnight—and oftentimes with very little first-hand study of the biblical text—simply because they see it as an indispensable part of the reformed system.

If you want to get ready for a reading challenge of some GOOD books, not the false doctrine kind of shallow and misleading books like The Shack, Tim Challies is gearing up for the 2017 reading Challenge. He’s got a pace from everything from slow to light-speed.

  • The Light Reader. This plan has 13 books which sets a pace of 1 book every 4 weeks.
  • The Avid Reader. The Avid plan adds another 13 books which increases the pace to 1 book every 2 weeks.
  • The Committed Reader. This plan adds a further 26 books, bringing the total to 52, or 1 book every week.
  • The Obsessed Reader. The Obsessed plan doubles the total to 104 books which sets a demanding pace of 2 books every week

Check it out! I would like to read the books of various genres Challies recommends at the Avid level, or 1 book every 2 weeks. But I’ve tried and utterly failed at reading challenges, Bible reading plans, and anything smacking of structure. It’s not in me. I might give it a try anyway, but if I’m like I always have been, I not only fail, but fail immediately, like by the third day. Oy. Maybe you will do better than me! Give it a go, it’s an interesting list of books!

————————————-
Further Reading

Review: Burning Down The Shack

4 thoughts on “Link-a-palooza: Melton, Shack, amillennialism, discernment, reading challenge

  1. Thanks for referencing my blog and the issue regarding the publishing industry. And yes, I do adhere to the Amil position. And yes I am a huge fan of John MacArthur. But I am not a fan of Dispensationalism. But it’s ok, John can’t be right about everything! 🙂

    The truth be told that all of the positions have issues with them. I find that the Amil position makes the most sense. But I would not die on that hill. The Gospel is of first importance and that hill is the one I would fight and die on.

    I like your post, doctrine really does matter. I was part of the charismatic movement for 20 years before I came to embrace Reformed Theology in 2008. So thankful the Lord show me mercy!

    Thanks again!

    Steve

    Like

  2. One other thing that makes Christians vulnerable is confusion. The new Christian or the undiscerning Christian is confused because one group teaches one thing and another group (or teacher) teaches another. This happened to me when I had only been a Christian for a couple of years. We were moving to another state and got a church recommend from a friend. Providentially, the Lord had led me to study Ephesians and Galatians just before we moved. At the new church, I began to hear confusing things. They taught that you had to be baptized to be saved and even that they had to do it, a prior baptism (even if immersion) was not good enough. They also taught that you had to be re-baptized if you ever fell into grievous sin. Well, part of me knew that this wasn’t right; that we are saved by grace through faith. But there are 2 or 3 scriptures in the NT that seem to be teaching that baptism saves, and that’s what they focused on, and so I was confused. I had not yet learned that scripture interprets scripture. Also that “the main things are the plain things, and the plain things are the main things.” So while there may be 2-3 scriptures that seem to teach salvation through baptism, there are 100+ other scriptures that teach otherwise. You don’t interpret the 100+ in light of the 3 scriptures, you interpret the 3 in light of the 100! I have since learned that that church was an off-shoot of a cult called the Boston Church of Christ. (the church I attended was called Metro Church in Denver, CO). Praise the Lord that He kindly brought me out of that church – the gracious Holy Spirit will lead us into all truth!

    Like

    • Thank you for that testimony! Very praiseworthy unto the Savior! Also thanks for the quick lesson in learning how to interpret scripture. Very helpful. I’m glad you’re out of that church now.

      Like

Comments are closed.