Many feel insignificant in their contribution to the Kingdom but can still make a powerful impact through humble service. Each person’s efforts, no matter how small or overlooked, hold value in God’s eyes. Like minor biblical figures who played crucial roles, everyone can honor God through sincere and prayerful actions.
When we think of a harem, artistic rendering like this may come to mind, beautifully adorned young women lounging languidly. And that may indeed been part of the harem girl’s day. But that’s not all it was.
“Girls of the Harem” (Italian artist Fabio Fabbi 1861-1946)
12Now when the turn came for each young woman to go in to King Ahasuerus, after the end of her twelve months under the regulations for the women—for the days of their beauty treatment were completed as follows: six months with oil of myrrh and six months with balsam oil and the cosmetics for women— 13the young woman would go in to the king in this way: anything that she desired was given her to take with her from the harem to the king’s palace. 14In the evening she would enter and in the morning she would return to the second harem, to the custody of Shaashgaz, the king’s eunuch who was in charge of the concubines. She would not go in to the king again, unless the king delighted in her and she was summoned by name. (Esther 2:12-14).
Xerxes
Xerxes was not a talented king. We read from the book From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire by Pierre Briant:
The Year 479 and Xerxes’ Reputation: Traditionally, modern historiography has presented a terrible image of Xerxes’ personality and reign. This image was already fully fashioned in Rawlinson’s Five Great Monarchies, a work published in 1867: with Xerxes began the disorders of the harem, assassinations, and conspiracies; around him were unleashed the passions of the court princesses and the growing influence of the eunuchs, with the result that “the character of Xerxes sank below that of any of his predecessors.” The king was weak, easily influenced, immature in his appetites, egotistical, cruel, superstitious, licentious.
What is a Concubine?
Concubines are a term used to describe a King’s woman used for sexual intimacy, without being a lawful wife. Lexham Bible Dictionary defines concubine as “A woman who is conjugally related to man but holds a secondary or inferior status to his primary wife.” For many women throughout history, the position served as one of the highest she could achieve in terms of power and safety. Hagar and Keturah were concubines of Abraham. Romans also had concubines.
The Old Testament contains 37 occurrences of the word “concubine” (pilegesh).
Belshazzar had concubines, see Daniel 5:1-3. They were present at the great feast when the Hand appeared and wrote on the wall.
Pharaoh took Abram’s wife Sarai into his palace as an intended concubine. (Genesis 12:15).
Judges chapter 19 describes a concubine degraded. In Patriarchal times a concubine had no authority in the family, and they could not share in the household government. Since they were not a legal wife, they could be sent away (example: Abraham and Hagar.)
Many kings in the Bible had concubines but Xerxes’ harem was the only one described with any detail, so we will focus on his harem for this essay. And Xerxes’ harem apartments have been excavated!
Harem excavation photos: Harem of Xerxes from the University of Chicago, Institute for the Study of Ancient Cultures. Caption is already contained in the photo. The ruins were excavated when the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago sponsored an archaeological expedition to Persepolis and its environs under the supervision of Professor Ernst Herzfeld from 1931 to 1934, and Erich F. Schmidt from 1934 to 1939.
What was it like in a harem?
Harem might be a familiar word to us but since harems existed in ancient times in China, Japan, India, Assyria, Persian, and Egypt, their practices and characteristics differed from one culture to another.
A harem is a place where women are sequestered in order to separate them from the world. Once in the harem they had very little interaction with the outside world, unless they were dismissed or in some lucky cases, retired. The women in a harem could not see the outside world and the outside world, including family (if they lived nearby) could not interact with them.
Where did all these women come from? They got there in different ways. Mostly coerced. Normally in a harem there were different classes of women, different groups, living in separate quarters and heavily guarded for their safety and privacy. In Xerxes’ case they were separated by virgin vs. concubine.
The third group of harem women were concubines, beautiful girls (Plutarch, Artoxerxes, 27; Diodorus, 17.77.6; Esther 2.3) bought in slave markets (Herodotus 8.105; Plutarch, Themistocles, 26.4), or received as a gift (Xenophon, Cyropaedia, 4.6, 11; 5.1, 1; 5, 2, 9, 39) and tribute (Herodotus 3. 97), or collected from different parts of the empire (Esther 2.2-3;), and even captured from rebellious subjects (Herodotus 4.19, 32; Cf. Grayson, 1975, p. 114). (Source Iranicaonline.)
Harems were highly regulated
System and Restrictions: Harems typically operated as a system of segregated living quarters for women, often within a palace or residence. They were usually guarded by eunuchs or trusted servants to maintain the privacy and security of the women inside. Women in harems often had limited freedom and were subject to strict rules and protocols. (Source).
The throne hall in the background…you can imagine Esther walking from this large harem complex tot he throne room, not knowing if she was going to be executed. “And then I will go in to the king, which is not in accordance with the law; and if I perish, I perish.” Esther 4:16.
What did they do all day? Greek Philosopher Aelian in his Varia Historia, 12.1 wrote- “While still virgins, they were kept and groomed in the harem’s “first house of women” (Esther 2.9), and trained as musicians, dancers and singers in order that they might entertain their king or the magnate lord at banquets or throughout the night.”
Their education was much better than women usually receive outside the harem. They were instructed in all the arts but also reading and math. They were also taught manners and traditions. It was the ultimate charm school. If the concubine did not excel at her education she would likely have been assigned tasks such as cooking or laundry in the harem. Of course also we see in the Esther verses there was a strict beauty regimen. All this would have taken up her time during the day.
As we see in the Esther verses above, once the woman has ‘gone into the King’ she was moved to a different harem than the one she occupied with the other virgins. In the second house she probably would have been helping to raise any children running around from the union of the concubine and the king. And as in any large system of operations, the women would have been accomplishing tasks such as continuing their education, practicing their musical instruments, or serving others. We know that Esther was given 7 maidservants. (Esther 2:9).
Josephus said in his Antiquities, 6.200 that Xerxes had 400 concubines.
In order to house 400 women, their guards, eunuchs, and servants, the complex would have had to be large!
What happened to Concubines?
Aging and Weakness: The fate of women in a harem as they aged or became weaker depended on the specific circumstances and the attitudes of those in power. In some cases, older or weaker women in a harem may have been assigned roles as caretakers or advisors to the younger members. Others might have been granted some level of freedom or retirement within the palace. However, there are also instances where elderly or weak women were marginalized or had diminished status within the harem. (Source).
A large and ornate harem was often constructed to display the king or sultan or pharaoh’s wealth and power. It would have been highly decocrated
Some were executed. The wife/queen of the king or sultan often wielded much power, and any concubine caught in an intrigue that displeased the queen or the king could be executed. In the 1640s Ibrahim the Mad, an Ottoman king, was told by one of his favored concubines that one of the others had slept with an outsider. Ibrahim was furious. He had his eunuchs investigate, then torture his 200+ concubines in the harem but either the tale was false and it didn’t happen, or they refused to give up one of their own. So Ibrahim had all 280 women sewn into weighted sacks and drowned in the Bosporus Strait. That was definitely a case where an intrigue blew back into unfortunate heights.
In a harem full of women, whether the virgin harem or the concubine harem, rumors and jockeying for position was rife. We see from the verses below that virgins could be favored, and since that is true, there must have been intrigue to catch the attention of the eunuch in charge of them to gain even more favor. But Esther didn’t do that. She trusted God and in HIS favor, Esther rose to the top without her having to curry attention or otherwise plan intrigues.
Esther Finds Favor: So it came about, when the command and decree of the king were heard and many young ladies were gathered to the citadel of Susa into the custody of Hegai, that Esther was taken to the king’s palace into the custody of Hegai, who was in charge of the women. Now the young lady pleased him and found favor with him. So he quickly provided her with her cosmetics and food, gave her seven choice female attendants from the king’s palace, and transferred her and her attendants to the best place in the harem.
Conclusion
A harem was a busy place. The women were physically prepared, intellectually prepared, and prepared in the arts, charms, and traditions of their culture. They worked raising the children, teaching others, or serving others. Of course if they were chosen, they worked at night, too. Though they had access to better food, education, clothing and even oils, perfumes, and jewels they might not have had access to ‘on the outside’, life in a harem was not always easy. They existed at the whims of the king, and walked a tightrope of luxury vs. execution or abandonment. We know that Esther took her life in her hands by approaching the unstable king Xerxes without his calling for her. It was only by the providence of God she was not executed, as was the rule.
Though the story of Esther is mainly taught to show us the providence of God, it also shows me personally how a life of jockeying and intrigue, gilded cages and sinful jealousies can ruin a life, where even in that environment trusting God for His provision and His life plan for us is always best. Doing so doesn’t always give rise to queenly proportions as it did for Esther, but her demeanor was queenly even before Xerxes took her into his heart, because she is the daughter of THE KING of KINGS. Her reliance on God, peaceful attitude, and kindness shone out among the hundreds of other women in those harem apartments in ancient Persia.
God is sovereign of the entire universe. He plans what he plans and He does what he pleases.
Our God is in the heavens; he does all that he pleases. (Psalm 115:3).
It’s admittedly hard to understand how God can and does orchestrate all events at once, constantly, over the earth and throughout the stars, so that His plans providentially combine in perfect harmony to enact His will. But He is God and we’re not supposed to understand it! It is also hard to understand how our personal decisions are still personal but also are part of His will and plan and the outcome is predetermined. That our decisions are our own yet are part of a pre-ordained plan that all leads to the cross and beyond is a tension our finite minds can’t comprehend. It is a joy to ponder them though, because in so doing, we come up against God’s power, omniscience, and will.
Here are two things to consider when looking at God’s providence and will, with our decisions and will.
Esther
The book of Esther was not written by Esther but it is about Esther, her Hebrew name was Hadassah. She lived during the time of King Ahasuerus of Persia, also known as King Xerxes. Through a series of providential events, Esther wound up as Queen to Ahasuerus and also was put in a position to save her people. However the saving of her people was at dire risk to her own life. She was discussing what to do with her uncle Mordecai, and Mordecai famously said,
“For if you keep silent at this time, relief and deliverance will rise for the Jews from another place, but you and your father’s house will perish. And who knows whether you have not come to the kingdom for such a time as this?” (Esther 4:14).
Esther could make her own decision. She could risk her life and go in to the King, or she could stay in the harem and not go to the King. Mordecai knew God’s character well enough to know that His promise to keep a remnant of His people alive would indeed happen, whether Esther decided to participate at this particular moment or not. God would keep His promise no matter what Esther decided. The choice was hers. Esther decided to go in and speak to the King even though he had not called for her (usually this meant death). We know the rest, Esther’s action revealed to the King the evil deeds of Haman and Haman was killed instead of the Jews.
Jael
Jael was the wife of Heber the Kenite. Sisera had been cruelly oppressing the Hebrews for 20 years. The people cried out. Deborah was civic leader at that time, prophesying and judging. She sent for Barak, the military leader and told him to go take care of the problem. Barak could freely decide what to do. He could go or he could not go, the choice was his. He said he would not go unless Deborah came with him. (Judges 4:8). His answer was in effect, no. Deborah replied that she would go with Barak, but it would be an embarrassment to him because God would deliver Sisera into the hands of a woman, and Barak would not get the military glory for the victory.
Barak freely made his choice, but now the outcome would occur from another quarter, just as Mordecai had said it would if Esther decided against her action.
Into the story enters Jael. After Barak routed Sisera’s army, Sisera fled. Sisera aimed toward the tent of Heber the Kenite. Sisera knew there was peace between Jabin the king of Hazor (Sisera’s King) and the house of Heber the Kenite. Heber had separated from the Kenites and was settled far from the action. Sisera ran, believing he was safe to go toward the area where there was no fighting and where there was peace between the parties. Normally he would be right, especially since hospitality customs were so strong in protecting those who are invited into the tent. However in this providential case, Sisera was wrong. Jael invited Sisera into the tent, gave him drink, and covered him as he fell asleep.
Note that Sisera fell asleep. He had a hard day of fighting, but even though his life was in peril he felt comfortable enough where he let down his guard and fall asleep. Women in those days were responsible for pitching the tents and so Jael was strong enough and familiar enough with how to efficiently hammer a tent peg into the ground. As Sisera slept, she drove a tent peg into his temple and pinned his head to the ground. The verse succinctly states, “So he died.” (Judges 4:21b).
And behold, as Barak was pursuing Sisera, Jael went out to meet him and said to him, “Come, and I will show you the man whom you are seeking.” So he went in to her tent, and there lay Sisera dead, with the tent peg in his temple. 23So on that day God subdued Jabin the king of Canaan before the people of Israel. (Judges 4:22-23).
Barak had kind of said “I will go” but not really. Placing conditions on your obedience isn’t really obedience to God. I like how the verse says God subdued Jabin.
Whether Esther went in or didn’t go in, God would deliver the Jews from Haman. Whether Barak went to battle or didn’t go to battle, God would deliver the Jews from King Jabin and Commander Sisera. Both Esther and Barak freely decided on a course of action. Yet both outcomes occurred at the providential hand of God.
God is amazing.
Anonymous.
Jael and Sisera
pen drawing — c. 1440 – 1450
Museum Herzog Anton Ulrich Museum, Braunschweig. The name of the drafter is not known. He is thought to be someone close to Van Eyck and his workshop. Source: Art and the Bible